When making small talk with people I am
unlikely to see again, I often waffle, obfuscate, or even lie about my
life. “I'm a housewife.” “I'm a temp.” “I'm between jobs
right now.” “I'm a chemical engineer. At a box factory. Oh,
specialty boxes. Very specialized actually. Uh... polymerization.
Polymerized coatings. Cardboard polymerization. Well it has to do
with structural variables and a proprietary folding algorithm, and,
um, would you excuse me?”
When I must genuinely introduce myself,
I generally stall as much as possible, but when asked directly about
what I “do,” I say that I am a dance teacher, or if I think the
company I'm in will not find it too pompous, a “dance artist.”
Then I equivocate some more, until the dreaded revelation can no longer
be put off. “I'm a belly dancer.”
|
I can show you contemporary examples of this sort of thing too, by the way, but I don't want to put anyone on the spot. |
And then things spin into apology and
meaninglessness. “But I'm really serious. Well, no, actually I'm
not exactly a 'professional dancer,' because I do more theatrical work, and it's not lucrative at all. I don't really do the kind of
restaurant and party dancing that's commercially viable. Oh no, I don't mean
that I do cultural presentations or theatrical folklore. I'm really
not very authentic, although I hate to say that, because it
sounds bad, right? Oh, sure, tribal fusion is amazing and very
serious, but I don't do that either. I do my own fusion, I'm artistic, but I
don't like to say that because when you hear 'fusion' or 'creative' or 'so-and-so does her own unique style' that just sounds inherently
terrible to me. And I'm not terrible. I'm really very good. I'm you know, a
really good dancer who happens to be a belly dancer. But, like, a
good dancer. I'm extremely technical. I sort of take it to a serious
place where it's not so constrained by its traditional context or
conceptual framework. But it's not technical and 'experimental' like
stark and awful and soulless... I'm still making dance that's about
beauty but taking it really seriously, being really serious not only
about clean lines but about the musicality and the emotional
expression and trying to elevate it to an artistic or even spiritual
realm...”
Here's the short version that I have
not yet adapted to easy conversational patter: I work in a medium
dedicated to the viewer's sensual gratification, but I do not pander,
and I am deeply dismayed when I am lumped in with those who do; I
work in a medium with low barriers to entry but I have uncompromising
standards of excellence for my own work, and I am deeply dismayed by
the preponderance of people who seem unable to tell the difference.
It isn't even that I find the
meretricious gambolings of my less-invested, uh, “colleagues” to
be that objectionable. Belly dance is meant to appeal to the senses, I don't apologize for its sensual nature, and I don't apologize for those who focus more narrowly on one sensual expression than another. If your primary motivation is to get attention with a skimpy outfit and you want to gracelessly flail in it, I admire your lack
of self-consciousness. If doing some nonspecific wiggling enhances
your self-esteem or enriches your inner fantasy life, go, sister, go.
If you make more money at the the strip club with an I
Dream of Jeannie act, I congratulate you on having found a
competitive advantage in a difficult line of work. Even if your intentions are high-minded but you're really just not a very good dancer, I don't want to be a judgmental jerk. Not everyone's good at everything.
I stumble over the words “I am a
belly dancer” because it weighs on my heart to throw my pearls
before swine. I consider my work worthy of respect, so I am very
tired of raised eyebrows, leers, uncomfortable silences, flustered
attempts to not appear closed-minded, and weird uses of “folk
dancer” or “empowerment” construed as polite euphemisms. Which isn't to
say that everyone's rude or poorly informed. But I don't think
I've ever met anyone whose first impression wasn't colored by the
assumption of some inherent frivolousness or inconsequentiality.
And I get it. I understand that, when
I identify myself as a belly dancer, all you can do is evaluate the
nature of my work, not the work itself. There's no reason why you
would arrive at the conclusion that I am creative, thoughtful,
meticulous, and highly skilled; that my dances are sophisticated
compositions, not a pretense for displays of skin; that my material
isn't a genre-bound rehash that depends on borrowed interest from
tired stereotypes; that only by the most extreme standards would my
costuming be considered salacious or would my movements be considered
obscene or vulgar; that my dance aims not to provoke lust, but to
charm, to fascinate, to delight.
This is why I have spent the last ten
years bending over backwards (in many cases literally), trying to be
seen, first and foremost, as an artist. This is why my “dance
name” is my name: Autumn Ward. As a concession to befuddled
speakers of English as a foreign language, I have sometimes Arabized
“Autumn” to “Fatima” (get it? F-Autumn-a?) or conflated my
initial, middle name, and surname, “A. Leah Ward” to “Alea al
Warda,” but I've never done work that I didn't want full credit
for, or that would be enhanced by being left open to
one-dimensionalization. This is why I make every dance look
different from the last one I created, why I spend so much time on
each new piece, and can only show perhaps three new dances in a good
year, and in a difficult year complete none. This is why I have a
blog dedicated to the critical analysis of each of my YouTube videos.
With every entry, I cringe at what I know might seem to be ridiculous
self-importance, but I see that people remain oblivious to most of
what I am doing until I explicitly spell it out. This is why I am
increasingly reluctant to put on a bedleh, the traditional 2-piece
bra-and-belt bellydance costume, and why I bristle at
characterizations of my style as “cabaret.”
And this is why I've been in the habit
of trying to make every posed photo an opportunity to portray myself
as someone with dance training, showcasing, if nothing else, my
flexibility, the carriage of my arms or the lift of my alignment.
|
I am bending over backwards for you, figuratively and literally, trying to be seen first and foremost as an artist. |
When I see photos of belly dancers with their hands in their hair or
lounging on a carpet I have a knee-jerk reaction of being NOT
impressed. Certainly the publicity posters of ballet and modern
companies never feature their stars luxuriously
reclining—they are shown gloriously athletically in motion. By
comparison, belly dancers appear to be distinguished primarily as
pretty ladies who are also owners/wearers of pretty costumes. Some
accomplishment.
|
What accomplishment is on display here? Which dancer's portrait commands respect for her dancing? At left, Linda Celeste Sims, at right, Mia Leimkuhler. |
At least that's been my attitude about
such photos recently.
But here's the thing: I like pretty
costumes and pretty pictures of pretty ladies as much as anyone. And
I particularly like lush images that show a softer aesthetic:
classically-styled pinups, golden age Hollywood and silent film
stills, the “Oriental” dancers and chorus girls of the 19th
century, fantasy art, fairy tale illustrations, Mucha, Beardsley,
Alma-Tadema, Waterhouse, Parrish, John R. Neill.... I cherish these
images. They inspire and transport me. In fact, they affect me
exactly as I hope to affect others through dance: with charm,
fascination, delight.
And I appreciate that these images,
like my dance, are works of creativity, thoughtfulness, and skill.
With this in mind, it becomes obvious to me that a beautiful photo of
a reclining dancer (or, for that matter, a nondancer in a dance
costume) is an accomplishment of styling, design, vision, and craft,
representing the real investment of a model and photographer, and
whatever support staff they have (or may not have) behind them.
Only when viewed through a filter of
snobbery is a model's prettiness, a quality that generally extends
far beyond her genetics, not an accomplishment in and of itself.
Posing, like dancing, is a real skill of intelligent physicality.
What in the old days they rightly called the “artfulness” of
one's appearance, the skillful and self-expressive creation of allure or smart style, is a talent
clearly not given to all. And, speaking as someone who is not
naturally slim, is not as young as she once was, and who owes her
figure, skin, hair, and teeth at least as much to a lifetime of
careful and disciplined choices and habits as to luck, I very well
know that it takes real work to create and maintain an attractive
face and body. These accomplishments are seldom vaunted or
praised—our culture, while it rewards beauty, sneers at vanity—but
I have no reservations about acknowledging their value.
Photographs can only hint at
coordination, musicality, and fluidity—the qualities on which even
the liveliest and boldest styles of belly dance rely. Belly
dancers waver, circle, spiral, and oscillate. Photos can no more
capture these energies than a picture of a candle can capture the
flame's flicker. The movement vocabulary of belly dance is
contained, never creating the leg extensions and jumps that are the
Kodak moments of Western dance. Softer styles do not “explode” on
stage, but instead are virtuoso displays of subtlety. These are
features, not bugs.
So what is the problem with
sensually-posed belly dance photo portraiture? I have to conclude
that the only problem is my double standard, that I am too wound up
in my personal crusade, and that I'm ready to give it a rest. I can
easily do what I ask of others, think critically, and see that the
choice to primarily communicate sensuality is not in any way a
shortcoming but its own legitimate expression. While some
contemporary costuming trends are not to my taste, and some
dancers/models lack artfulness, these are failures of content, not
medium.
Offering someone the pleasure of
looking at a beautiful image is not really so different from offering
them the pleasure of watching a beautiful dance. Perhaps a
newcomer runs the risk of being thought not a very good dancer if her
pictures emphasize something other than her dance training, but those
who jump to this conclusion are unlikely to be belly dance
aficionados. Belly dance photos are not a job interview at the
bank: to show sensuality is not unseemly. The fact is that
beautiful images are accomplishments of joy, comfort, inspiration,
and cheer. They lifts our hearts, soothe our spirits, and fire our
imaginations.
Despite the value I place on work,
despite the recognition I seek for my work, there's nothing appealing
to me about evaluating the success of belly dance through the dour lens of
a Protestant work ethic. Belly dance, above all else, is an
accomplishment of mystery. Of all the reasons to dance, I can think of none
more noble than undertaking belly dance as an act of re-enchanting
the world.
Maybe it's time for me to get back in a
bedleh. Maybe it's time for me to celebrate sensuality on its own terms and merits. I'm going to assume that at this point, if you haven't formed an opinion about my accomplishments in dance, new photos won't sway your opinion one way or the other no matter how they are posed. The world can never have too many pretty pictures of pretty ladies.
(Did I really just work so hard on an essay about working hard to justify posting a picture of myself not working hard? Oh yes I did. The irony is not lost on me.)
Happy Valentine's Day.